Waltham Restaurants Owners: No Additional Liquor Licenses

Proposal would issue more liquor licenses.

Waltham business owners and residents gave a resounding ‘no’ last night to the proposal to issue additional liquor licenses in the city.

In total, 76 people at last night’s Waltham City Council/License Commission hearing stood in opposition of the proposal, while only one favored it.

The public input hearing, which started at 7 p.m., ran for 40 minutes with business owners and residents soundly opposing the draft proposal to issue 15 additional licenses in a bid to draw more restaurants to certain locations the city is aiming to develop.

For full background on the proposal,

Concerns of Business Owners/Residents

  • “The only thing we are opposed to is the way [restaurants] … would acquire our licenses,” said Adam Rubin, who owns on Moody Street.
  • “15 new licenses would basically take my license and make it worthless,” Rubin said.
  • Instead, Rubin suggested new restaurants purchase existing licenses from restaurants that are not doing well.
  • Additional licenses would saturate the market with large chain restaurants, said Bill Honeycutt, the owner of on Main Street.
  • Honeycutt also said it’s unfair that a new business would only have to rent a license from the city whereas he had to pay $198,000.
  • John Grasso, a Sudbury resident who owns the chain, said his experience with a similar proposal in Dedham, indicates would could happen if Waltham passed its proposal. Grasso said that after more liquor licenses were issued to accomodate the Legacy Place shopping complex, sales at his location dropped from 1.8 million to 1.35 million. 
  • “You can expect your local restaurants … their sales will be off for a six month period,” Grasso said, noting the drop would be up to 20 percent “If this goes through, your going to hurt a lot of these little guys.”
  • Lou Giovanetti, who plans to open a pizzeria on Moody Street this summer, said that business owners should have a chance to organize and collectively testify on how many licenses should be issued. “One hour is not enough time,” he said.
  • owner Paul LaCava spoke several times to voice his concerns, including that more licenses would hurt businesses on Moody Street. He also said that with the legalization of casino gambling in Massachusetts, casinos could also impact local businesses. “I am not afraid of competition. I am afraid of unfair competition and an oversatureated market,” LaCava said.
  • Nicole Franchi, a Waltham resident who said she recently held an event at the Elephant Walk, said she was concerned that chain restaurants would hurt Waltham’s charm. im really concerned that oversautrating this market, were really going to ruin the character,” she said.


  • Only one person spoke in favor of the proposal, a representative of the proposed developments at the former Polaroid site. He said restaurants are crucial to new developments, but acknowledged his was in the minority. 

Future of Proposal

  • With the first hearing complete, if the city decides to draft legislation for new licenses, another hearing will be held. 
suecalish May 15, 2012 at 02:13 PM
suecalish May 15, 2012 at 02:16 PM
Joe May 15, 2012 at 05:53 PM
But don't you feel bad for John Grasso, a Sudbury resident (excuse me), whose profits dropped to 1.35 million, not bad profits if you ask most working class people. And whatever happened with competition being good for businesses.
Joe May 15, 2012 at 05:54 PM
Ryan Grannan-Doll (Editor) May 15, 2012 at 06:06 PM
Joe, Mr. Grasso's revenues dropped, but another thing to consider is whether his costs increased. I'm willing to bet they did.
Tim Hill May 15, 2012 at 09:21 PM
Ryan, don't get caught up in the personal stories. It takes your focus off the issue, which is whether or not the new licenses are a good idea for the City of Waltham. The restaurant owners want to make it personal because they don't want their licenses to decrease in value (nor would I) but that is not the issue here. We can't let the interests of few trump the economic interests of an entire city. The good thing to come out of this is that we will get a clear picture of who the members of the license commission believe they work for, the City of Waltham or the owners of the businesses the regulate. By the way, Joe, you changed "revenue" to "profit" it your post. Big different. Grasso would be very happy to profit a million from a single location. And while Grasso's costs may have increased on some items, he would have been smart enough to reduce variable expenses like inventory and labor when he saw the decrease in sales. If you have been to a Half Way Cafe, you have seen that they are well run. He is a smart business owner. Though the article does not mention that his restaurant is not in Waltham, but in Watertown.
Ryan Grannan-Doll (Editor) May 15, 2012 at 10:22 PM
Hi Tim, Thanks for comment. I preface my comments with the fact that I have no dog in this fight. However, this is a personal story on one level. It's personal for the restaurant owners who work hard in a difficult business and it is personal to the people who would benefit from additional tax dollars that maybe could pay for more senior housing, longer school days or better roads.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something