patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Delays For Five Guys/Panera/Chipotle Opening?

An update on the proposals for three eateries in Waltham.

 

Mistakes in construction of the new Main Street Marketplace have thrown a wrinkle into the plans for a new Five Guys, Panera Bread and Chipotle. 

As a result, the Waltham City Council has approved giving the three companies more time to review and receive their special fast food permits required to operate a fast food or "fast casual" eatery in Waltham.

All three stores would be located at the new shopping plaza at 1030 Main St.

City Councilor Ed Tarallo, who chairs the city's Ordinance & Rules Committee that has been reviewing the applications, said more review is needed due to the tenant's spaces being built in violation of previously approved site conditions. He did not elaborate further. 

iParty and Doctors Express are already operating at the Main Street Marketplace. SuperCuts, and Massage Envy have proposed stores there. 

The City Council now has to until March 31, 2013 to decide on the permits for Panera Bread and Chipotle and until Feb. 28 to decide on Five Guys's permit. The committee, however, could seek more time extensions. 

Previously, Five Guys has said it wanted to open by the end of January of 2013 and Panera Bread has said it wants to open by March. 

Related Topics: 1030 Main St. Waltham, Chipotle, Five Guys, Local Connections, and Panera BRead

Beryl Porter

9:55 am on Wednesday, December 12, 2012

Why do things like this seem to happen in Waltham? First the construction at Lexington and Trapelo is halted by a sudden pull back by the developer and now this bizarre mistake in construction that possibly leave spaces empty for months and months at least. We need to have better oversight streamlining and facilitating new business construction.

Reply

Kristine Munroe

10:02 am on Wednesday, December 12, 2012

Seriously??? Way to go, Waltham. As if there needs to be more empty storefronts. I can't imagine why anyone would want to open an eatery in Waltham.

Reply

theclefe

10:13 am on Wednesday, December 12, 2012

By "mistakes in construction" you mean the city council found something to quibble about rather than an unsafe condition, correct?

Reply

Bob Tanski

10:17 am on Wednesday, December 12, 2012

Do the people who run this city hate money? Let's get these businesses open, paying taxes and employing people.

Reply

Warren Dale

10:25 am on Wednesday, December 12, 2012

Its amazing a part time city councilor was able to identify mistakes in construction but our full time building inspectors did not ? Why do these "mistakes" not apply the the retail occupants currently doing business there? Any reason these "mistakes" cant be made public ?

Reply
Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Ryan Grannan-Doll

10:34 am on Wednesday, December 12, 2012

Warren Dale,

Read the story again. It does not say Tarallo found the mistakes. He merely mentioned them during a meeting.

Also, I am seeking more info on this story. Stay tuned.

WHSHawk

10:28 am on Wednesday, December 12, 2012

How do we get someone elaborate further?

Is the council just being stupid and nitpicking over something like moving a door 20 feet? Or did the developers build in a completely different configuration than the plans? Or did the council not read the plans in the first place and now they're acting surprised?

Reply

Jen P

10:38 am on Wednesday, December 12, 2012

At least one problem is the window on the Weston St. side of the building. The developer decided to go ahead with that design feature while the drive-thru was not yet permitted. Ultimately it did not pass. It was not on the original design. I think it was hubris on the part of the developers.

Reply
Comment_arrow

theclefe

10:55 am on Wednesday, December 12, 2012

How dare a developer think that he could add features that would make a business profitable in Waltham. What a jerk.

Simon

11:00 am on Wednesday, December 12, 2012

Am I right that there wouldn't be this level of scrutiny if the businesses weren't defined as fast food? That arbitrary distinction has got to go! It's costing the city tax dollars and jobs.

Reply

Matt Carter

1:09 pm on Wednesday, December 12, 2012

Ubelivebale!!!!! Yet again more feet dragging from our councilers. I would not be shocked at all if Five Guys, Chipolte & Panera back out and that will leave half the plaza vacant. WE NEED JOBS. I have been out of work for years ad was looking forward to working at a new buisiness but why would I think the council would change, ha, what was I thinking. The council can lie all they want that the building was not built right but we all know they are just dragging there feet. WELCOME TO WALTHAM!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Robert G. Logan

10:03 pm on Wednesday, December 12, 2012

Matt - If you have proof of your wreckless charges, please present them.

Robert G. Logan
Councillor Ward 9

Cairo kid

1:06 pm on Wednesday, December 12, 2012

and is the council ALWAYS saying, Waltham is business'
friendly/ What Lies!
We need a new council, Waltham!

Reply

Catch Wity

1:34 pm on Wednesday, December 12, 2012

Your recent contribution:
"You would think in this time of financial hardship that cities would welcome businesses that will bring $ into the city but instead they're met with red tape & harrassment!! Complain about the economy & then step on your own feet, We need a new mayor, maybe someone that actually knows what they are doing! SMH!!!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Alice H

2:10 pm on Wednesday, December 12, 2012

Catch - The mayor is not responsible for the actions of the city council and is not a part of the process of approving fast food permits or any other business permits. So please do not blame the mayor for Waltham's "business friendly" environment.

Mk10

1:39 pm on Wednesday, December 12, 2012

Shocker!!! Remember last week when Waltham was touted as being business friendly by the city council? I think this says something else. The coucil will again blame the layers for not doing things correctly, but they change the rules as they go along and make them jump through hoops to get their permits. Wake up councillors. I'll say it again WE elect YOU. Please listen to these comments above. They are your constituents and you should listen to them!

Reply

Ace

1:49 pm on Wednesday, December 12, 2012

"City Councilor Ed Tarallo, who chairs the city's Ordinance & Rules Committee that has been reviewing the applications, said more review is needed due to the tenant's spaces being built in violation of previously approved site conditions."

Hmmm. Someone should of thought of that BEFORE the first business opened.
This is ridiculous. If it's the extra window for the denied drive thru, it can be closed off quickly. To make the owners go to the additional expense of removing it is ridiculous.

Reply

Alice H

2:10 pm on Wednesday, December 12, 2012

Maybe councilor Logan will write an explanation on Patch. He seems to be willing to communicate with the public.

Reply

Joe

4:59 pm on Wednesday, December 12, 2012

Why should the city council listen to you guys!! You are only there to fund their retirement and cushy pension and keep the unions happy. Keep working and paying taxes. Oh by way, the taxes need to be increased next year because they the collection fell short. Dont worry..its for "the crumbling schools".

Reply

Kristine Munroe

1:10 pm on Thursday, February 28, 2013

Any updates on this? They have until today to decide on the Five Guys permit, at least.

Reply

Leave a comment